公式動画ピックアップ
AAPL
ADBE
ADSK
AIG
AMGN
AMZN
BABA
BAC
BL
BOX
C
CHGG
CLDR
COKE
COUP
CRM
CROX
DDOG
DELL
DIS
DOCU
DOMO
ESTC
F
FIVN
GILD
GRUB
GS
GSK
H
HD
HON
HPE
HSBC
IBM
INST
INTC
INTU
IRBT
JCOM
JNJ
JPM
LLY
LMT
M
MA
MCD
MDB
MGM
MMM
MSFT
MSI
NCR
NEM
NEWR
NFLX
NKE
NOW
NTNX
NVDA
NYT
OKTA
ORCL
PD
PG
PLAN
PS
RHT
RNG
SAP
SBUX
SHOP
SMAR
SPLK
SQ
TDOC
TEAM
TSLA
TWOU
TWTR
TXN
UA
UAL
UL
UTX
V
VEEV
VZ
WDAY
WFC
WK
WMT
WORK
YELP
ZEN
ZM
ZS
ZUO
公式動画&関連する動画 [Meet SAO Autotune: From 79% to 95% Eval Accuracy in One Click]
Watch SAO’s Autotune automatically improve eval accuracy from 79% F1 to 95% F1 with just a handful of human corrections, no manual prompt engineering required. This demo shows the complete observe-correct-tune-verify loop that compounds with every iteration.
Out-of-the-box evals are 70% accurate at best. Even custom evals drift as your application evolves. Closing the accuracy gap traditionally takes hours of expert feedback and manual prompt engineering. Autotune automates this entire process.
In this demo, you'll see:
Starting with stock context adherence eval (79% F1 baseline)
Providing natural language corrections on mislabeled traces
One-click tuning cycle that rewrites evaluation criteria
Prompt transformation: tightened rubrics and domain-specific language
Validation: 95% F1 score on 2,000-trace benchmark
15.5% accuracy improvement from minutes of feedback
Re-evaluating production log streams with tuned metrics
The compounding improvement loop: observe, correct, tune, verify
Key Results:
F1 Score: 0.79 → 0.95 (+20% improvement)
Accuracy: 80.9% → 96.4% (+15.5 percentage points)
From: 2 out of 10 eval scores wrong
To: Fewer than 1 out of 20 eval scores wrong
Scale this to thousands of daily production traces and the impact compounds, better metrics, fewer hallucinations slipping through, and more confidence in every release.
Try Splunk Agent Observability: https://www.splunk.com/en_us/download/observability-cloud-free-edition.html
Docs: https://agent-observability-docs.splunk.com/what-is-splunk-agent-observability
0:00 - The Problem: 70% Baseline Eval Accuracy
0:22 - Stock Context Adherence Eval Testing
0:40 - Baseline Results: 79% F1 Score (2 of 10 Wrong)
0:50 - Reviewing Traces in Galileo Console
1:03 - Identifying Mislabeled Trace: Property Values Question
1:15 - Human Correction with Natural Language Explanation
1:28 - One-Click Autotune Activation
1:35 - Under the Hood: Prompt Rewriting Process
1:45 - Validation: Testing Tuned Metric on Same Traces
2:05 - Benchmark Results: 79% → 95% F1 Score
2:14 - Accuracy Improvement: 80.9% → 96.4%
2:40 - Re-Evaluating Production Log Stream
2:52 - Corrected Results Across the Board
3:10 - The Compounding Loop: Better Metrics, Fewer Hallucinations
53
0