Most climate risk assessments are missing hazards, scoping too narrowly, and leaving physical climate risk under-analyzed. Linda Romanovska helped write the rules, and she’s here to explain what better reporting looks like. As co-author of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and a member of the EU Sustainability Reporting Board, Linda has spent 20 years working on climate risk assessment across sectors and jurisdictions. She joined The Pre-Read to break down what mandatory climate-related financial disclosure requires. In this episode: Why most climate risk assessments assess too few hazards The key differences between physical climate risk and transition risk How to scope scenarios and time horizons without cutting corners What climate-related financial disclosure users want to see Where AI is making climate risk assessment faster and more audit-ready Subscribe for more episodes with CFOs, sustainability leaders, and finance executives navigating the decisions that define their functions. #ClimateRiskAssessment #PhysicalClimateRisk #SustainabilityReporting #ESRS #CSRD #ClimateDisclosure #CFO #ThePreRead » Subscribe to Workiva: https://www.youtube.com/@Workiva Workiva Inc. (NYSE: WK) powers trust, transparency, and accountability. Accounting, finance, sustainability, risk and audit teams from more than 6,600 organizations, including over 85% of Fortune 1,000 companies rely on Workiva for their mission-critical work. We transform how customers connect data, unify processes, and empower teams in a secure, audit-ready, collaborative platform. Learn more at workiva.com. Connect with Workiva Online! » Visit Workiva.com: https://www.workiva.com/ » Follow Workiva on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/workiva/ » Follow Workiva on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/workiva/ » Check out the Workiva podcast, “The Pre-Read”: https://www.workiva.com/podcast/the-pre-read

 89      0